TIA TR14 STEERING COMMITTEE FAQ - 2.0 LOADS

Navigation

Do you want to register?

133 users online :: 133 Guests and 0 Registered

Sticky FAQs

Questions in 2.0 LOADS

Page 5 out of 5 Pages

We understand section 2.6.4.1 to apply only to areas that are not listed in App. B or to areas that may have special wind or ice loading that generate higher loads than those specified in App. B. Would it be possible to use section 2.6.4.1 to justify wind or ice loads that are less than those prescribed in App. B?
(554444 views)
Where it has been suggested in previous posts that topography factors shall be determined in the worst case wind direction. Can the combination of topography factors and exposure factors in specific wind directions be looked at differently for each wind d
(568760 views)
Where it has been suggested in previous posts that topography factors shall be determined in the worst case wind direction. Can the combination of topography factors and exposure factors in specific wind directions be looked at differently for each wind direction or must the worst case topography and worst case exposure apply in all wind directions?
(570284 views)
2.6.8 and Figure 2‐1 While considering the appurtenance load including ice in Rev G, should we consider thedefault ice thickness or the escalated design ice thickness calculated per Section 2.6.8 of TIA‐222‐G?
(85561 views)
2.6.9.1.1 For square towers: How can we calculate the DF and DR factors for other wind directions?
(69062 views)

<< previous 1 2 3 4 5

one category up